This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. dbenbenn | talk 10:03, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This would be advertising, except it lacks a link to anything; Google doesn't find anything for "hobosh network", and for "hobosh" I don't see anything relevant. I can't see any evidence that this is encyclopedic, even if it wasn't written as an advertisement. CDC(talk) 22:23, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete this ad, for what, uhm, I may not want to know. Wyss 00:32, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete, either an ad for something obscure or an unverifiable hoax, non-notable either way.-- Infrogmation 15:59, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Just Delete it is just patent nonsense(whose patent?) TAS 16:39, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
*I'm wrong but still deleteTAS 16:41, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete, unless someone can come up with some evidence that this exists. Kim Bruning 00:44, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.